A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials

INTRODUCTION: Systematic reviews evaluating the impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review for biomedical publications highlighted that interventions were limited and have little impact. This study aims to compare the accuracy of early career peer reviewers who use an innovative o...

Descrición completa

Gardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:BMJ Open
Main Authors: Chauvin, Anthony, Moher, David, Altman, Doug, Schriger, David L, Alam, Sabina, Hopewell, Sally, Shanahan, Daniel R, Recchioni, Alessandro, Ravaud, Philippe, Boutron, Isabelle
Formato: Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Assuntos:
Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acceso en liña:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640136/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28918414
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017462
Tags: Engadir etiqueta
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!

Títulos similares