A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials

INTRODUCTION: Systematic reviews evaluating the impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review for biomedical publications highlighted that interventions were limited and have little impact. This study aims to compare the accuracy of early career peer reviewers who use an innovative o...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Publicado no:BMJ Open
Main Authors: Chauvin, Anthony, Moher, David, Altman, Doug, Schriger, David L, Alam, Sabina, Hopewell, Sally, Shanahan, Daniel R, Recchioni, Alessandro, Ravaud, Philippe, Boutron, Isabelle
Formato: Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Publicado em: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Assuntos:
Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acesso em linha:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640136/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28918414
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017462
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!

Registos relacionados