A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials

INTRODUCTION: Systematic reviews evaluating the impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review for biomedical publications highlighted that interventions were limited and have little impact. This study aims to compare the accuracy of early career peer reviewers who use an innovative o...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:BMJ Open
Auteurs principaux: Chauvin, Anthony, Moher, David, Altman, Doug, Schriger, David L, Alam, Sabina, Hopewell, Sally, Shanahan, Daniel R, Recchioni, Alessandro, Ravaud, Philippe, Boutron, Isabelle
Format: Artigo
Langue:Inglês
Publié: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Sujets:
Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Accès en ligne:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640136/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28918414
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017462
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!

Documents similaires