A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials

INTRODUCTION: Systematic reviews evaluating the impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review for biomedical publications highlighted that interventions were limited and have little impact. This study aims to compare the accuracy of early career peer reviewers who use an innovative o...

Descripció completa

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Publicat a:BMJ Open
Autors principals: Chauvin, Anthony, Moher, David, Altman, Doug, Schriger, David L, Alam, Sabina, Hopewell, Sally, Shanahan, Daniel R, Recchioni, Alessandro, Ravaud, Philippe, Boutron, Isabelle
Format: Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Publicat: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Matèries:
Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Accés en línia:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640136/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28918414
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017462
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!

Ítems similars