Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

BACKGROUND: Preprint usage is growing rapidly in the life sciences; however, questions remain on the relative quality of preprints when compared to published articles. An objective dimension of quality that is readily measurable is completeness of reporting, as transparency can improve the reader’s...

Descripció completa

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Publicat a:Res Integr Peer Rev
Autors principals: Carneiro, Clarissa F. D., Queiroz, Victor G. S., Moulin, Thiago C., Carvalho, Carlos A. M., Haas, Clarissa B., Rayêe, Danielle, Henshall, David E., De-Souza, Evandro A., Amorim, Felippe E., Boos, Flávia Z., Guercio, Gerson D., Costa, Igor R., Hajdu, Karina L., van Egmond, Lieve, Modrák, Martin, Tan, Pedro B., Abdill, Richard J., Burgess, Steven J., Guerra, Sylvia F. S., Bortoluzzi, Vanessa T., Amaral, Olavo B.
Format: Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Publicat: BioMed Central 2020
Matèries:
Research
Accés en línia:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7706207/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292815
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00101-3
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!

Ítems similars