Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

BACKGROUND: Preprint usage is growing rapidly in the life sciences; however, questions remain on the relative quality of preprints when compared to published articles. An objective dimension of quality that is readily measurable is completeness of reporting, as transparency can improve the reader’s...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Publicado no:Res Integr Peer Rev
Main Authors: Carneiro, Clarissa F. D., Queiroz, Victor G. S., Moulin, Thiago C., Carvalho, Carlos A. M., Haas, Clarissa B., Rayêe, Danielle, Henshall, David E., De-Souza, Evandro A., Amorim, Felippe E., Boos, Flávia Z., Guercio, Gerson D., Costa, Igor R., Hajdu, Karina L., van Egmond, Lieve, Modrák, Martin, Tan, Pedro B., Abdill, Richard J., Burgess, Steven J., Guerra, Sylvia F. S., Bortoluzzi, Vanessa T., Amaral, Olavo B.
Formato: Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Publicado em: BioMed Central 2020
Assuntos:
Research
Acesso em linha:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7706207/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292815
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00101-3
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!

Registos relacionados