Collaborative quality improvement vs public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention: A comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention in New York vs Michigan

INTRODUCTION: Public reporting (PR) is a policy mechanism that may improve clinical outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, prior studies have shown that PR may have an adverse impact on patient selection. It is unclear whether alternatives to PR, such as collaborative qualit...

Cijeli opis

Spremljeno u:
Bibliografski detalji
Izdano u:Am Heart J
Glavni autori: Boyden, Thomas F., Joynt, Karen E., McCoy, Lisa, Neely, Megan L., Cavender, Matthew A., Dixon, Simon, Masoudi, Frederick A., Peterson, Eric, Rao, Sunil V., Gurm, Hitinder S.
Format: Artigo
Jezik:Inglês
Izdano: 2015
Teme:
Article
Online pristup:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948714/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26678645
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2015.09.006
Oznake: Dodaj oznaku
Bez oznaka, Budi prvi tko označuje ovaj zapis!

Similar Items