Collaborative quality improvement vs public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention: A comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention in New York vs Michigan

INTRODUCTION: Public reporting (PR) is a policy mechanism that may improve clinical outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, prior studies have shown that PR may have an adverse impact on patient selection. It is unclear whether alternatives to PR, such as collaborative qualit...

Descripció completa

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Publicat a:Am Heart J
Autors principals: Boyden, Thomas F., Joynt, Karen E., McCoy, Lisa, Neely, Megan L., Cavender, Matthew A., Dixon, Simon, Masoudi, Frederick A., Peterson, Eric, Rao, Sunil V., Gurm, Hitinder S.
Format: Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Publicat: 2015
Matèries:
Article
Accés en línia:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948714/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26678645
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2015.09.006
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!

Ítems similars