טוען...
Individual versus group decision making: Jurors’ reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony
To investigate dual-process persuasion theories in the context of group decision making, we studied low and high need-for-cognition (NFC) participants within a mock trial study. Participants considered plaintiff and defense expert scientific testimony that varied in argument strength. All participan...
שמור ב:
| הוצא לאור ב: | PLoS One |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| פורמט: | Artigo |
| שפה: | Inglês |
| יצא לאור: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
| נושאים: | |
| גישה מקוונת: | https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606931/ https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28931011 https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183580 |
| תגים: |
הוספת תג
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!
|