Efficacy and adverse events of cold vs hot polypectomy: A meta-analysis

AIM: To compare previously reported randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of cold and hot polypectomy, we systematically reviewed and clarify the utility of cold polypectomy over hot with respect to efficacy and adverse events. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the predominance of co...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:World J Gastroenterol
Autores principales: Fujiya, Mikihiro, Sato, Hiroki, Ueno, Nobuhiro, Sakatani, Aki, Tanaka, Kazuyuki, Dokoshi, Tatsuya, Fujibayashi, Shugo, Nomura, Yoshiki, Kashima, Shin, Gotoh, Takuma, Sasajima, Junpei, Moriichi, Kentaro, Watari, Jiro, Kohgo, Yutaka
Formato: Artigo
Lenguaje:Inglês
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2016
Materias:
Meta-Analysis
Acceso en línea:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910665/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27340361
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i23.5436
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

Ejemplares similares