Efficacy and adverse events of cold vs hot polypectomy: A meta-analysis

AIM: To compare previously reported randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of cold and hot polypectomy, we systematically reviewed and clarify the utility of cold polypectomy over hot with respect to efficacy and adverse events. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the predominance of co...

Descrición completa

Gardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:World J Gastroenterol
Main Authors: Fujiya, Mikihiro, Sato, Hiroki, Ueno, Nobuhiro, Sakatani, Aki, Tanaka, Kazuyuki, Dokoshi, Tatsuya, Fujibayashi, Shugo, Nomura, Yoshiki, Kashima, Shin, Gotoh, Takuma, Sasajima, Junpei, Moriichi, Kentaro, Watari, Jiro, Kohgo, Yutaka
Formato: Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2016
Assuntos:
Meta-Analysis
Acceso en liña:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910665/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27340361
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i23.5436
Tags: Engadir etiqueta
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!

Títulos similares