Efficacy and adverse events of cold vs hot polypectomy: A meta-analysis

AIM: To compare previously reported randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of cold and hot polypectomy, we systematically reviewed and clarify the utility of cold polypectomy over hot with respect to efficacy and adverse events. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the predominance of co...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Pubblicato in:World J Gastroenterol
Autori principali: Fujiya, Mikihiro, Sato, Hiroki, Ueno, Nobuhiro, Sakatani, Aki, Tanaka, Kazuyuki, Dokoshi, Tatsuya, Fujibayashi, Shugo, Nomura, Yoshiki, Kashima, Shin, Gotoh, Takuma, Sasajima, Junpei, Moriichi, Kentaro, Watari, Jiro, Kohgo, Yutaka
Natura: Artigo
Lingua:Inglês
Pubblicazione: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2016
Soggetti:
Meta-Analysis
Accesso online:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910665/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27340361
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i23.5436
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne! !

Documenti analoghi