Cargando...
Peer-Selected “Best Papers”—Are They Really That “Good”?
BACKGROUND: Peer evaluation is the cornerstone of science evaluation. In this paper, we analyze whether or not a form of peer evaluation, the pre-publication selection of the best papers in Computer Science (CS) conferences, is better than random, when considering future citations received by the pa...
Gardado en:
| Publicado en: | PLoS One |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Formato: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acceso en liña: | https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4366404/ https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25789480 https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118446 |
| Tags: |
Engadir etiqueta
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!
|