Carregant...
Peer-Selected “Best Papers”—Are They Really That “Good”?
BACKGROUND: Peer evaluation is the cornerstone of science evaluation. In this paper, we analyze whether or not a form of peer evaluation, the pre-publication selection of the best papers in Computer Science (CS) conferences, is better than random, when considering future citations received by the pa...
Guardat en:
| Publicat a: | PLoS One |
|---|---|
| Autors principals: | , , |
| Format: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Publicat: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4366404/ https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25789480 https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118446 |
| Etiquetes: |
Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|