Initial Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ítems similars

• Heated Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula (HHHFNC) is not an effective method for initial treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) versus nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP)
  per: Armanian, Amir-Mohammad, et al.
  Publicat: (2019)
• Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) as an initial therapy for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm and near-term infants
  per: Iranpour, Ramin, et al.
  Publicat: (2019)
• Comparing the Efficacy of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Early Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants
  per: Gharehbaghi, Manizheh Mostafa, et al.
  Publicat: (2019)
• Early versus delayed initiation of nasal continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in premature newborns: A randomized clinical trial
  per: Badiee, Zohreh, et al.
  Publicat: (2013)
• Evaluation of the efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in the preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)
  per: Asif Ashraf, et al.
  Publicat: (2020-10-01)