Comparing the Efficacy of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Early Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants

Documenti analoghi

• Evaluation of the efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in the preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)
  di: Asif Ashraf, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2020-10-01)
• Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants
  di: Lemyre, Brigitte, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2016)
• Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation
  di: Lemyre, Brigitte, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2017)
• Non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) after extubation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome
  di: Özkan İlhan, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2019-12-01)
• Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs. Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Initial Treatment After Birth in Extremely Preterm Infants
  di: Yasemin Ezgi Kostekci, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2022-04-01)