Understanding conflict among experts working on controversial species: A case study on the Australian dingo

Abstract Expert elicitation can be valuable for informing decision‐makers on conservation and wildlife management issues. To date, studies eliciting expert opinions have primarily focused on identifying and building consensus on key issues. Nonetheless, there are drawbacks of a strict focus on conse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliografische Detailangaben

Hauptverfasser:	Valerio Donfrancesco, Benjamin L. Allen, Rob Appleby, Linda Behrendorff, Gabriel Conroy, Mathew S. Crowther, Christopher R. Dickman, Tim Doherty, Bronwyn A. Fancourt, Christopher E. Gordon, Stephen M. Jackson, Chris N. Johnson, Malcolm S. Kennedy, Loukas Koungoulos, Mike Letnic, Luke K.‐P. Leung, Kieren J. Mitchell, Bradley Nesbitt, Thomas Newsome, Carlo Pacioni, Justine Phillip, Brad V. Purcell, Euan G. Ritchie, Bradley P. Smith, Danielle Stephens, Jack Tatler, Lily M. vanEeden, Kylie M. Cairns
Format:	Artigo
Sprache:	Inglês
Veröffentlicht:	Wiley 2023-03-01
Schriftenreihe:	Conservation Science and Practice
Schlagworte:	carnivore conservation social sciences dissensus evidence human‐wildlife conflict values
Online-Zugang:	https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12900
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie das erste Tag hinzu!