Understanding conflict among experts working on controversial species: A case study on the Australian dingo

Abstract Expert elicitation can be valuable for informing decision‐makers on conservation and wildlife management issues. To date, studies eliciting expert opinions have primarily focused on identifying and building consensus on key issues. Nonetheless, there are drawbacks of a strict focus on conse...

Descrición completa

Detalles Bibliográficos

Principais autores:	Valerio Donfrancesco, Benjamin L. Allen, Rob Appleby, Linda Behrendorff, Gabriel Conroy, Mathew S. Crowther, Christopher R. Dickman, Tim Doherty, Bronwyn A. Fancourt, Christopher E. Gordon, Stephen M. Jackson, Chris N. Johnson, Malcolm S. Kennedy, Loukas Koungoulos, Mike Letnic, Luke K.‐P. Leung, Kieren J. Mitchell, Bradley Nesbitt, Thomas Newsome, Carlo Pacioni, Justine Phillip, Brad V. Purcell, Euan G. Ritchie, Bradley P. Smith, Danielle Stephens, Jack Tatler, Lily M. vanEeden, Kylie M. Cairns
Formato:	Artigo
Idioma:	Inglês
Publicado:	Wiley 2023-03-01
Series:	Conservation Science and Practice
Assuntos:	carnivore conservation social sciences dissensus evidence human‐wildlife conflict values
Acceso en liña:	https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12900
Tags:	Engadir etiqueta Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!