Reporting preclinical anesthesia study (REPEAT): Evaluating the quality of reporting in the preclinical anesthesiology literature.

Poor reporting quality may contribute to irreproducibility of results and failed 'bench-to-bedside' translation. Consequently, guidelines have been developed to improve the complete and transparent reporting of in vivo preclinical studies. To examine the impact of such guidelines on core methodologi...

Fuld beskrivelse

Bibliografiske detaljer

Principais autores:	Dean A Fergusson, Marc T Avey, Carly C Barron, Mathew Bocock, Kristen E Biefer, Sylvain Boet, Stephane L Bourque, Isidora Conic, Kai Chen, Yuan Yi Dong, Grace M Fox, Ronald B George, Neil M Goldenberg, Ferrante S Gragasin, Prathiba Harsha, Patrick J Hong, Tyler E James, Sarah M Larrigan, Jenna L MacNeil, Courtney A Manuel, Sarah Maximos, David Mazer, Rohan Mittal, Ryan McGinn, Long H Nguyen, Abhilasha Patel, Philippe Richebé, Tarit K Saha, Benjamin E Steinberg, Sonja D Sampson, Duncan J Stewart, Summer Syed, Kimberly Vella, Neil L Wesch, Manoj M Lalu, Canadian Perioperative Anesthesia Clinical Trials Group
Format:	Artigo
Sprog:	Inglês
Udgivet:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Serier:	PLoS ONE
Online adgang:	https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215221
Tags:	Tilføj Tag Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!