Reporting preclinical anesthesia study (REPEAT): Evaluating the quality of reporting in the preclinical anesthesiology literature.

Poor reporting quality may contribute to irreproducibility of results and failed 'bench-to-bedside' translation. Consequently, guidelines have been developed to improve the complete and transparent reporting of in vivo preclinical studies. To examine the impact of such guidelines on core methodologi...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos

Principais autores:	Dean A Fergusson, Marc T Avey, Carly C Barron, Mathew Bocock, Kristen E Biefer, Sylvain Boet, Stephane L Bourque, Isidora Conic, Kai Chen, Yuan Yi Dong, Grace M Fox, Ronald B George, Neil M Goldenberg, Ferrante S Gragasin, Prathiba Harsha, Patrick J Hong, Tyler E James, Sarah M Larrigan, Jenna L MacNeil, Courtney A Manuel, Sarah Maximos, David Mazer, Rohan Mittal, Ryan McGinn, Long H Nguyen, Abhilasha Patel, Philippe Richebé, Tarit K Saha, Benjamin E Steinberg, Sonja D Sampson, Duncan J Stewart, Summer Syed, Kimberly Vella, Neil L Wesch, Manoj M Lalu, Canadian Perioperative Anesthesia Clinical Trials Group
Formato:	Artigo
Idioma:	Inglês
Publicado em:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
coleção:	PLoS ONE
Acesso em linha:	https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215221
Tags:	Adicionar Tag Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!