Mechanical chest compression versus manual chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract Background Cardiac arrest (CA) is high‐risk for death and hard to rescue. There are two methods of chest compression: mechanical and manual. However, it remains unclear which provides better outcomes for patients. Therefore, we perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis for the efficacy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos

Autores principales:	Yuduo Pu, Haoyu Hou, Zhiming You, Qike Li, Zihan Yu, Siyu He, Chengxin Xue, Chengli Wen, Bo Yang
Formato:	Artigo
Lenguaje:	Inglês
Publicado:	Wiley 2025-12-01
Colección:	Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine
Materias:	cardiac arrest cardiopulmonary resuscitation manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation mechanical chest compression return of spontaneous circulation rate
Acceso en línea:	https://doi.org/10.1002/hkj2.70067
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!