Continuous ventilation versus 30:2 strategy in mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation – a manikin-based simulation study

Abstract Background There is conflicting data about which ventilation strategy is better when performing external chest compressions with mechanical devices. During manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation, continuous ventilation is recommended when the airway is secured and a ventilation rate of 10/min...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos

Principais autores:	Bernhard Benda, Oliver Fuchs, Magdalena Benda, Fabian Perschinka, Nicolas Prokes, Thomas Ploner, Andrea Köhler, Michael Joannidis, Frank Hartig
Formato:	Artigo
Idioma:	Inglês
Publicado em:	BMC 2026-02-01
coleção:	BMC Emergency Medicine
Assuntos:	Mechanical chest compression device (MCD) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) 30:2 Continuous ventilation (CV) Resuscitation Mechanical CPR (mCPR)
Acesso em linha:	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01493-z
Tags:	Adicionar Tag Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!