On Some Objections to the Deductive Closure of Legal Systems
I criticize an argument presented by Pablo Navarro and Jorge Rodríguez (2014) against the conception of legal systems as sets of statements closed under logical consequence. First, I show that the example on which they ground their argument incurs in a fallacy of equivocation. Then, I recognize that...
Uloženo v:
| Hlavní autor: | |
|---|---|
| Médium: | Artigo |
| Jazyk: | Inglês |
| Vydáno: |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)
2017-11-01
|
| Edice: | Crítica |
| Témata: | |
| On-line přístup: | http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/pg/en/descarga_ing.php?id_volumen=180&id_articulo=1128 |
| Tagy: |
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|