On Some Objections to the Deductive Closure of Legal Systems
I criticize an argument presented by Pablo Navarro and Jorge Rodríguez (2014) against the conception of legal systems as sets of statements closed under logical consequence. First, I show that the example on which they ground their argument incurs in a fallacy of equivocation. Then, I recognize that...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Publicado em: |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)
2017-11-01
|
| coleção: | Crítica |
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/pg/en/descarga_ing.php?id_volumen=180&id_articulo=1128 |
| Tags: |
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|