Evaluating Differences in Whole Blood, Serum, and Urine Screening Tests for Zika Virus, Puerto Rico, USA, 2016

We evaluated nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) for Zika virus on whole-blood specimens compared with NAAT on serum and urine specimens among asymptomatic pregnant women during the 2015–2016 Puerto Rico Zika outbreak. Using NAAT, more infections were detected in serum and urine than in whole...

Descrición completa

Gardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Emerg Infect Dis
Main Authors: Rosinger, Asher Y., Olson, Samantha M., Ellington, Sascha R., Perez-Padilla, Janice, Simeone, Regina M., Pedati, Caitlin S., Schroeder, Betsy A., Santiago, Gilberto A., Medina, Freddy A., Muñoz-Jordán, Jorge L., Adams, Laura E., Galang, Romeo R., Valencia-Prado, Miguel, Bakkour, Sonia, Colón, Candimar, Goodwin, Mary, Meaney-Delman, Dana, Read, Jennifer S., Petersen, Lyle R., Jamieson, Denise J., Deseda, Carmen C., Honein, Margaret A., Rivera-García, Brenda, Shapiro-Mendoza, Carrie K.
Formato: Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2021
Assuntos:
Dispatch
Acceso en liña:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084515/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33900183
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2705.203960
Tags: Engadir etiqueta
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!

Títulos similares