Corrigendum to “Analytical and clinical comparison of Viasure (CerTest Biotec) and 2019-nCoV CDC (IDT) RT-qPCR kits for SARS-CoV2 diagnosis” [Virology volume (2021) 154–156]

Lignende værker

• Analytical and clinical comparison of Viasure (CerTest Biotec) and 2019-nCoV CDC (IDT) RT-qPCR kits for SARS-CoV2 diagnosis.
  af: Freire-Paspuel, Byron, et al.
  Udgivet: (2021)
• Evaluation of nCoV-QS (MiCo BioMed) for RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal samples using CDC FDA EUA qPCR kit as a gold standard: An example of the need of validation studies
  af: Freire-Paspuel, Byron, et al.
  Udgivet: (2020)
• Diagnostic performance of CerTest and Panbio antigen rapid diagnostic tests to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection
  af: Pérez-García, Felipe, et al.
  Udgivet: (2021)
• Analytical and Clinical Evaluation of “AccuPower SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex RT-PCR kit (Bioneer, South Korea)” and “Allplex 2019-nCoV Assay (Seegene, South Korea)” for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Diagnosis: Korean CDC EUA as a Quality Control Proxy for Developing Countries
  af: Freire-Paspuel, Byron, et al.
  Udgivet: (2021)
• Analytical and Clinical Evaluation of Two RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostic Tests with Emergency Use Authorization in Ecuador
  af: Freire-Paspuel, Byron, et al.
  Udgivet: (2021)