Reply to “On Clinical Utility and Systematic Reporting in Case Studies of Healthcare Process Mining. Comment on: 10.3390/ijerph17041348 ‘Towards the Use of Standardised Terms in Clinical Case Studies for Process Mining in Healthcare’ ”

Documenti analoghi

• On Clinical Utility and Systematic Reporting in Case Studies of Healthcare Process Mining. Comment on: 10.3390/ijerph17041348 “Towards the Use of Standardised Terms in Clinical Case Studies for Process Mining in Healthcare”
  di: Mordaunt, Dylan A.
  Pubblicazione: (2020)
• Towards the Use of Standardized Terms in Clinical Case Studies for Process Mining in Healthcare †
  di: Helm, Emmanuel, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2020)
• Reply to Comment on Oldenburg, M., Jensen, H.J. Stress and Strain among Seafarers Related to the Occupational Groups. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, doi:10.3390/ijerph16071153
  di: Oldenburg, Marcus, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2020)
• Reply to Comment on Chen, J., Su, Y., Si, H., Chen, J. Managerial Areas of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Scientometric Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15 (11), 2350, doi:10.3390/ijerph15112350
  di: Chen, Jianguo, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2019)
• Reply to Accelerated Silicosis—An Emerging Epidemic Associated with Engineered Stone. Comment on Leso, V. et al. Artificial Stone-Associated Silicosis: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(4), 568, doi:10.3390/ijerph16040568
  di: Leso, Veruscka, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2019)