A response to “Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look” by Lund and Iyer

Recently, Lund and Iyer (L&I) raised an argument regarding the use of likelihood ratios in court. In our view, their argument is based on a lack of understanding of the paradigm. L&I argue that the decision maker should not accept the expert’s likelihood ratio without further consideration....

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Forensic Sci Int
Auteurs principaux: Gittelson, Simone, Berger, Charles E.H., Jackson, Graham, Evett, Ian W., Champod, Christophe, Robertson, Bernard, Curran, James M., Taylor, Duncan, Weir, Bruce S., Coble, Michael D., Buckleton, John S.
Format: Artigo
Langue:Inglês
Publié: 2018
Sujets:
Article
Accès en ligne:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306225/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29857959
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.025
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!

Documents similaires