Comparison of Clinical Trials and Administrative Claims to Identify Stroke Among Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: Findings from the Extending Trial-Based Evaluations of Medical Therapies Using Novel Sources of Data (EXTEND) Study

Ítems similars

• Use of Administrative Claims to Assess Outcomes and Treatment Effect in Randomized Clinical Trials for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Findings from the Extending Trial-Based Evaluations of Medical Therapies Using Novel Sources of Data (EXTEND) Study
  per: Strom, Jordan B., et al.
  Publicat: (2020)
• Validating the Use of Registries and Claims Data to Support Randomized Trials: Rationale and Design of the Extending Trial-Based Evaluations of Medical Therapies Using Novel Sources of Data (EXTEND) Study
  per: Strom, Jordan B., et al.
  Publicat: (2019)
• Validation of Administrative Claims to Ascertain Outcomes in Pivotal Trials of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
  per: Butala, Neel M., et al.
  Publicat: (2020)
• Comparability of Event Adjudication Versus Administrative Billing Claims for Outcome Ascertainment in the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) Study: Findings from the EXTEND-DAPT Study
  per: Faridi, Kamil F., et al.
  Publicat: (2021)
• Use of Administrative Claims Data to Estimate Treatment Effects for Thirty Versus Twelve Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Findings from the EXTEND-DAPT Study
  per: Faridi, Kamil F., et al.
  Publicat: (2020)