Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV

BACKGROUND: It is still uncertain whether coronary bifurcations with lesions involving a large side branch (SB) should be treated by stenting the main vessel and provisional stenting of the SB (simple) or by routine two-stent techniques (complex). We aimed to compare clinical outcome after treatment...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Open Heart
Hauptverfasser: Kumsars, Indulis, Holm, Niels Ramsing, Niemelä, Matti, Erglis, Andrejs, Kervinen, Kari, Christiansen, Evald Høj, Maeng, Michael, Dombrovskis, Andis, Abraitis, Vytautas, Kibarskis, Aleksandras, Trovik, Thor, Latkovskis, Gustavs, Sondore, Dace, Narbute, Inga, Terkelsen, Christian Juhl, Eskola, Markku, Romppanen, Hannu, Laine, Mika, Jensen, Lisette Okkels, Pietila, Mikko, Gunnes, Pål, Hebsgaard, Lasse, Frobert, Ole, Calais, Fredrik, Hartikainen, Juha, Aarøe, Jens, Ravkilde, Jan, Engstrøm, Thomas, Steigen, Terje K, Thuesen, Leif, Lassen, Jens F
Format: Artigo
Sprache:Inglês
Veröffentlicht: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Schlagworte:
Interventional Cardiology
Online Zugang:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999681/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076558
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000947
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Ähnliche Einträge