Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV

BACKGROUND: It is still uncertain whether coronary bifurcations with lesions involving a large side branch (SB) should be treated by stenting the main vessel and provisional stenting of the SB (simple) or by routine two-stent techniques (complex). We aimed to compare clinical outcome after treatment...

Descripció completa

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Publicat a:Open Heart
Autors principals: Kumsars, Indulis, Holm, Niels Ramsing, Niemelä, Matti, Erglis, Andrejs, Kervinen, Kari, Christiansen, Evald Høj, Maeng, Michael, Dombrovskis, Andis, Abraitis, Vytautas, Kibarskis, Aleksandras, Trovik, Thor, Latkovskis, Gustavs, Sondore, Dace, Narbute, Inga, Terkelsen, Christian Juhl, Eskola, Markku, Romppanen, Hannu, Laine, Mika, Jensen, Lisette Okkels, Pietila, Mikko, Gunnes, Pål, Hebsgaard, Lasse, Frobert, Ole, Calais, Fredrik, Hartikainen, Juha, Aarøe, Jens, Ravkilde, Jan, Engstrøm, Thomas, Steigen, Terje K, Thuesen, Leif, Lassen, Jens F
Format: Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Publicat: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Matèries:
Interventional Cardiology
Accés en línia:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999681/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076558
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000947
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!

Ítems similars