Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct‐Related Artery–Only Revascularization for Patients With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock

Lignende værker

• Impact of multivessel versus single-vessel disease on the association between low diastolic blood pressure and mortality after acute myocardial infarction with revascularization
  af: Min Kim, et al.
  Udgivet: (2024-02-01)
• Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Culprit‐Only Versus One‐Stage Versus Multistage Revascularization
  af: Kim, Min Chul, et al.
  Udgivet: (2020)
• Prognostic Implications of Door‐to‐Balloon Time and Onset‐to‐Door Time on Mortality in Patients With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  af: Park, Jonghanne, et al.
  Udgivet: (2019)
• Immediate multivessel revascularization may increase cardiac death and myocardial infarction in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease: data analysis from real world practice
  af: Chung, Woo-Young, et al.
  Udgivet: (2016)
• Multivessel vs Single‐Vessel Revascularization in Patients With Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome and Multivessel Disease in the Drug‐Eluting Stent Era
  af: Lee, Hyun Jong, et al.
  Udgivet: (2011)