Pipeline embolization device versus coiling for the treatment of large and giant unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE: Rupture of large or giant intracranial aneurysms leads to significant morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Both coiling and the Pipeline embolization device (PED) have been shown to be safe and clinically effective for the treatment of unruptured large and giant intracranial aneur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurosurg Focus
Hauptverfasser: Wali, Arvin R., Park, Charlie C., Santiago-Dieppa, David R., Vaida, Florin, Murphy, James D., Khalessi, Alexander A.
Format: Artigo
Sprache:Inglês
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Schlagworte:
Article
Online Zugang:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6369699/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28565986
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1749
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Ähnliche Einträge