Pipeline embolization device versus coiling for the treatment of large and giant unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE: Rupture of large or giant intracranial aneurysms leads to significant morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Both coiling and the Pipeline embolization device (PED) have been shown to be safe and clinically effective for the treatment of unruptured large and giant intracranial aneur...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Pubblicato in:Neurosurg Focus
Autori principali: Wali, Arvin R., Park, Charlie C., Santiago-Dieppa, David R., Vaida, Florin, Murphy, James D., Khalessi, Alexander A.
Natura: Artigo
Lingua:Inglês
Pubblicazione: 2017
Soggetti:
Article
Accesso online:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6369699/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28565986
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1749
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne! !

Documenti analoghi