Debate: Should the elderly receive thrombolytic therapy, or primary angioplasty, for acute myocardial infarction? The case for primary angioplasty
As the population ages the number of elderly patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) will continue to increase. There has been no head-to-head trial of thrombolytic therapy versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in this patient cohort, but there is evidence that f...
保存先:
| 出版年: | Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med |
|---|---|
| 主要な著者: | , |
| フォーマット: | Artigo |
| 言語: | Inglês |
| 出版事項: |
BMC
2000
|
| 主題: | |
| オンライン･アクセス: | https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC59621/ https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11714430/ https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttps://doi.org/10.1186/cvm-1-3-146 |
| タグ: |
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
|