Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data

Different analytical methods can yield competing interpretations of evolutionary history and, currently, there is no definitive method for phylogenetic reconstruction using morphological data. Parsimony has been the primary method for analysing morphological data, but there has been a resurgence of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biol Lett
Main Authors: O'Reilly, Joseph E., Puttick, Mark N., Parry, Luke, Tanner, Alastair R., Tarver, James E., Fleming, James, Pisani, Davide, Donoghue, Philip C. J.
Format: Artigo
Language:Inglês
Published: The Royal Society 2016
Subjects:
Palaeontology
Online Access:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881353/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27095266
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0081
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items