Caricamento...
Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals
We apply a novel mistake index to assess trends in the proportion of corrections published between 1993 and 2014 in Nature, Science and PNAS. The index revealed a progressive increase in the proportion of corrections published in these three high-quality journals. The index appears to be independent...
Salvato in:
| Pubblicato in: | PeerJ |
|---|---|
| Autori principali: | , |
| Natura: | Artigo |
| Lingua: | Inglês |
| Pubblicazione: |
PeerJ Inc.
2016
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756748/ https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26893961 https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1670 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne! !
|