Načítá se...
Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment
BACKGROUND: Protraction facemask has been advocated for treatment of class III malocclusion with maxillary deficiency. Studies using tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion (RPE) appliance as anchorage have experienced side effects such as forward movement of the maxillary molars, excessive proclination...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Prog Orthod |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , , |
| Médium: | Artigo |
| Jazyk: | Inglês |
| Vydáno: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
| Témata: | |
| On-line přístup: | https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4547969/ https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26303311 https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0096-7 |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo otaguje tento záznam!
|