載入...
Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment
BACKGROUND: Protraction facemask has been advocated for treatment of class III malocclusion with maxillary deficiency. Studies using tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion (RPE) appliance as anchorage have experienced side effects such as forward movement of the maxillary molars, excessive proclination...
Na minha lista:
| 發表在: | Prog Orthod |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| 格式: | Artigo |
| 語言: | Inglês |
| 出版: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4547969/ https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26303311 https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0096-7 |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|