IMRT, IGRT, and other high technology becomes standard in external beam radiotherapy: But is image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer too expensive?

Samankaltaisia teoksia

• Reply to the comment of S. VanDyk and K. Narayan on the editorial "IMRT, IGRT and other high technology become standard in external beam radiotherapy: But is image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer too expensive?" J Med Phys 2015;40:1-4
  Tekijä: Swamidas V Jamema, et al.
  Julkaistu: (2015-01-01)
• Reply to the comment of S. VanDyk and K. Narayan on the editorial “IMRT, IGRT and other high technology become standard in external beam radiotherapy: But is image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer too expensive?” J Med Phys 2015;40:1-4
  Tekijä: Jamema, Swamidas V, et al.
  Julkaistu: (2015)
• Radiobiological considerations in combining doses from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer
  Tekijä: Tornero-López, Ana M., et al.
  Julkaistu: (2018)
• Boost in radiotherapy: external beam sunset, brachytherapy sunrise
  Tekijä: Maciejewski, Boguslaw
  Julkaistu: (2009)
• Future directions of in vivo dosimetry for external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy
  Tekijä: Verhaegen, Frank, et al.
  Julkaistu: (2020)