Correction for Fanelli and Ioannidis, Reply to Nuijten et al.: Reanalyses actually confirm that US studies overestimate effects in softer research

Documenti analoghi

• Reply to Nuijten et al.: Reanalyses actually confirm that US studies overestimate effects in softer research
  di: Fanelli, Daniele, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2014)
• US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research
  di: Fanelli, Daniele, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2013)
• Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer research
  di: Nuijten, Michèle B., et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2014)
• Correction to: reply to Woodley of Menie et al.
  di: Arslan, Ruben C., et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2018)
• Correction to: ‘Comment on van Casteren et al. (2018): softer metallic spheres do abrade harder enamel’
  di: Xia, Jing, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2019)