Standards in the Face of Uncertainty: Peer Review Is Flawed and Under-Researched, but the Best We Have

Ítems similars

• The Virtues of Correct Citation: Careful Referencing Is Important but Is Often Neglected/Even in Peer Reviewed Articles
  per: Mertens, Stephan, et al.
  Publicat: (2011)
• The Check-up Before Publication: Once the Peer-Review Process Has Been Completed, Scientific Texts Are Revised One Final Time by the Editors to Make Them Easier to Read and to Understand
  per: Mertens, Stephan
  Publicat: (2008)
• On Ghost Authorship and Reviews: The 6(th) International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication
  per: Baethge, Christopher
  Publicat: (2009)
• Reply: Have we done the best that we could have done?
  per: Arora, Rakesh C., et al.
  Publicat: (2020)
• Transparent Texts: Authors of Scientific Articles Often Have Conflicts of Interest. It Is Important for These to Be Communicated Transparently to the Readers
  per: Baethge, Christopher
  Publicat: (2008)