Functional haemodynamic monitoring: the relative merits of SVV, SPV and PPV as measured by the LiDCOrapid in predicting fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients

Podobne zapisy

• Comparison of cardiac index: LiDCOrapid and PiCCOplus in the ICU
  od: Brass, P, i wsp.
  Wydane: (2011)
• LiDCOrapid and PiCCOplus preload response parameter validation study
  od: Brass, P, i wsp.
  Wydane: (2011)
• Effects of continuous infusion of phenylephrine vs. norepinephrine on parturients and fetuses under LiDCOrapid monitoring: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
  od: Feng, Kunpeng, i wsp.
  Wydane: (2020)
• Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values
  od: Asamoto, Masaaki, i wsp.
  Wydane: (2016)
• Validity of Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) Compared with Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness
  od: Rathore, Abhishek, i wsp.
  Wydane: (2017)