MRI and ultrasound versus conventional measures of disease activity and structural damage in evaluating treatment efficacy in JIA. Do these imaging techniques have an additional value?

Documenti analoghi

• MRI and ultrasound versus conventional measures of disease activity and structural damage in evaluating treatment efficacy in JIA. Do these imaging techniques have an additional value?
  di: Malattia, C, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2011)
• MRI and ultrasound versus conventional measures of disease activity and structural damage in evaluating treatment efficacy in JIA. Do these imaging techniques have an additional value?
  di: Malattia, C, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2011)
• PReS-FINAL-2010: Predictive value of whole-body MRI in juvenile dermatomyositis
  di: Malattia, C, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2013)
• Analysis of ceiling effect and score distribution of outcome measures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)
  di: Lattanzi, B, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2008)
• 2.4 Magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography and conventional radiography in the assessment of bone erosions in juvenile idiopathic arthritis
  di: Malattia, C, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2008)