Bullshit for you; transcendence for me. A commentary on "On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit"
In reply to Dalton (2016), we argue that bullshit is defined in terms of how it is produced, not how it is interpreted. We agree that it can be interpreted as profound by some readers (and assumed as much in the original paper). Nonetheless, we present additional evidence against the possibility tha...
Сохранить в:
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Artigo |
| Язык: | Inglês |
| Опубликовано: |
Cambridge University Press
2016-01-01
|
| Серии: | Judgment and Decision Making |
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15923ac/jdm15923ac.pdf |
| Метки: |
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|