MRI and ultrasound versus conventional measures of disease activity and structural damage in evaluating treatment efficacy in JIA. Do these imaging techniques have an additional value?

Samankaltaisia teoksia

• MRI and ultrasound versus conventional measures of disease activity and structural damage in evaluating treatment efficacy in JIA. Do these imaging techniques have an additional value?
  Tekijä: Viola S, et al.
  Julkaistu: (2011-09-01)
• Analysis of ceiling effect and score distribution of outcome measures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)
  Tekijä: Lattanzi B, et al.
  Julkaistu: (2008-09-01)
• 2.4 Magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography and conventional radiography in the assessment of bone erosions in juvenile idiopathic arthritis
  Tekijä: Malattia C, et al.
  Julkaistu: (2008-09-01)
• Comparison of physician's, parent's and patient's global ratings made on linear or 21-circle visual analogue scales (VAS) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)
  Tekijä: Dalprà S, et al.
  Julkaistu: (2008-09-01)
• Comparison of the accuracy of different definitions of clinical remission (CR) and minimal disease activity (MDA) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)
  Tekijä: Davì S, et al.
  Julkaistu: (2008-09-01)