Mechanical versus manual chest compression in cardiac arrest: a systematic review

Background: Early high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is crucial for survival following cardiac arrest. To-date, ILCOR has suggested against routine use of mechanical chest compressions, reserving its use for settings where manual compressions are difficult to continue. Due to awareness...

Descripció completa

Dades bibliogràfiques

Autors principals:	Helen Pocock, Tonia C. Nicholson, Lukasz Szarpak, Jasmeet Soar, Katherine M. Berg, Markus B. Skrifvars, Ian Drennan, Ari Moskowitz, Carolyn M. Zelop, Keith Couper, Karen G. Hirsch, Mathias J. Holmberg, Nikolaos I. Nikolaou, Rakesh Garg, Brian E. Grunau, Peter J. Kudenchuk, Eric J. Lavonas, Asger Granfeldt, Shannon M. Fernando, Shinichiro Ohshimo, Sonia D’Arrigo, Claudio Sandroni, Tommaso Scquizzato, Yew Woon Chia, Carrie Kah-Lai Leong, Conor P. Crowley, Neville Vlok, Bernd W. Böttiger, Brian J. O’Neil, Charles D. Deakin, Michael JA Parr, Michelle Welsford, Robert W. Neumar, Jerry P. Nolan
Format:	Artigo
Idioma:	Inglês
Publicat:	Elsevier 2026-05-01
Col·lecció:	Resuscitation Plus
Matèries:	Cardiac arrest Mechanical chest compressions Advanced life support Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Systematic review
Accés en línia:	http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520426000962
Etiquetes:	Afegir etiqueta Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!