The Presumptions of Meaning. Hamblin and Equivocation.
When we use a word, we face a crucial epistemic gap: we ground our move on the fact that our interlocutor knows the meaning of the word we used, and therefore he can interpret our dialogical intention. However, how is it possible to know the other’s mind? Hamblin explained this dialogical problem ad...
Збережено в:
| Автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Artigo |
| Мова: | Inglês |
| Опубліковано: |
University of Windsor
2011-11-01
|
| Серія: | Informal Logic |
| Предмети: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/3326 |
| Теги: |
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|