A randomised investigation of journal responses to academic and journalist enquiry about possible scientific misconduct
Abstract Objective We investigated whether responses about possible scientific misconduct from journals to journalists would differ in speed, usefulness, and tone from responses to academics. Twelve journals that published 23 clinical trials about which concerns had been previously raised were rando...
Збережено в:
| Автори: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Artigo |
| Мова: | Inglês |
| Опубліковано: |
BMC
2018-07-01
|
| Серія: | BMC Research Notes |
| Предмети: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-018-3613-1 |
| Теги: |
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|