Clinical Outcomes of Skeletal Anchorage Versus Conventional Anchorage in the Class III Orthopaedic Treatment in Growing Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of skeletal anchorage, compared to conventional anchorage, in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion in growing patients. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A specific search strategy was de...

Celý popis

Podrobná bibliografie

Hlavní autoři:	Rachele Podda, Francesca Imondi, Adriana Assunta De Stefano, Martina Horodynski, Roberto Antonio Vernucci, Gabriella Galluccio
Médium:	Artigo
Jazyk:	Inglês
Vydáno:	Turkish Orthodontic Society 2025-06-01
Edice:	Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Témata:	class iii malocclusion orthodontic anchorage procedures orthodontic appliances interceptive treatment bone anchored maxillary protraction (bamp)
On-line přístup:	https://turkjorthod.org/articles/clinical-outcomes-of-skeletal-anchorage-versus-conventional-anchorage-in-the-class-iii-orthopaedic-treatment-in-growing-patients-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/doi/TurkJOrthod.2025.2024.38
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!