Valve‐in‐Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Background In the absence of randomized controlled trials, reports from nonrandomized studies comparing valve‐in‐valve implantation (ViV) to redo surgical aortic valve replacement (rAVR) have shown inconsistent results. Methods and Results PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Centra...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos

Principais autores:	Matthias Raschpichler, Suzanne de Waha, David Holzhey, Guido Schwarzer, Nir Flint, Danon Kaewkes, Paul T. Bräuchle, Danny Dvir, Raj Makkar, Gorav Ailawadi, Mohamed Abdel‐Wahab, Holger Thiele, Michael A. Borger
Formato:	Artigo
Idioma:	Inglês
Publicado em:	Wiley 2022-12-01
coleção:	Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Assuntos:	aortic stenosis failed surgical aortic bioprosthesis redo surgical aortic valve replacement, valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Acesso em linha:	https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.024848
Tags:	Adicionar Tag Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!