Importance of free access to research articles on decision to submit to the BMJ: survey of authors

Por Schroter, Sara
Publicado em 2006

Response to Scientific journals are ‘faith based’: is there a science behind peer review?

Por Schroter, Sara
Publicado em 2007

BMJ training for peer reviewers: We are offering free courses in London and a training pack on bmj.com

Por Schroter, Sara, Groves, Trish
Publicado em 2004

Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions

Por Schroter, Sara, Tite, Leanne
Publicado em 2006

Evidence based publishing: The BMJ's ongoing programme of editorial research is now at bmjresearch.com

Por Tite, Leanne, Schroter, Sara
Publicado em 2006

Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey

Por Tite, Leanne, Schroter, Sara
Publicado em 2007

Authors' perceptions of electronic publishing: two cross sectional surveys

Por Schroter, Sara, Barratt, Helen, Smith, Jane
Publicado em 2004

Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors

Por Schroter, Sara, Tite, Leanne, Smith, Richard
Publicado em 2005

Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives

Por Schroter, Sara, Groves, Trish, Højgaard, Liselotte
Publicado em 2010

Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials

Por Schroter, Sara, Glasziou, Paul, Heneghan, Carl
Publicado em 2012

Does declaration of competing interests affect readers' perceptions? A randomised trial

Por Chaudhry, Samena, Schroter, Sara, Smith, Richard, Morris, Julie
Publicado em 2002

Editors' declaration of their own conflicts of interest

Por Haivas, Irina, Schroter, Sara, Waechter, Fabian, Smith, Richard
Publicado em 2004

How should abridged scientific articles be presented in journals? A survey of readers and authors

Por Müllner, Marcus, Waechter, Fabian, Schroter, Sara, Squire, Barbara
Publicado em 2005

Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot

Por Schroter, Sara, Miles, Rebecca, Green, Stephen, Jackson, Mark
Publicado no BMJ Open (2017)

Recruitment of doctors to non-standard grades in the NHS: analysis of job advertisements and survey of advertisers

Por Dosani, Sabina, Schroter, Sara, MacDonald, Rhona, Connor, Jackie
Publicado em 2003

Does the type of competing interest statement affect readers' perceptions of the credibility of research? Randomised trial

Por Schroter, Sara, Morris, Julie, Chaudhry, Samena, Smith, Richard, Barratt, Helen
Publicado em 2004

Effect of different financial competing interest statements on readers' perceptions of clinical educational articles: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Por Schroter, Sara, Pakpoor, Julia, Morris, Julie, Chew, Mabel, Godlee, Fiona
Publicado no BMJ Open (2016)

Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial

Por Schroter, Sara, Black, Nick, Evans, Stephen, Carpenter, James, Godlee, Fiona, Smith, Richard
Publicado em 2004

What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?

Por Schroter, Sara, Black, Nick, Evans, Stephen, Godlee, Fiona, Osorio, Lyda, Smith, Richard
Publicado em 2008

Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project

Por Dixon-Woods, Mary, Foy, Chris, Hayden, Charlotte, Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam, Tebbutt, Stephen, Schroter, Sara
Publicado no BMJ Open (2016)