Assessment vs. appraisal of ethical aspects of health technology assessment: can the distinction be upheld?

Por Sandman, Lars, Heintz, Emelie
Publicado no GMS Health Technol Assess (2014)

Beyond the Black Box Approach to Ethics!: Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy"

Por Sandman, Lars, Gustavsson, Erik
Publicado no Int J Health Policy Manag (2016)

The (Ir)relevance of Group Size in Health Care Priority Setting: A Reply to Juth

Por Sandman, Lars, Gustavsson, Erik
Publicado no Health Care Anal (2016)

Ethical deliberations about involuntary treatment: interviews with Swedish psychiatrists

Por Sjöstrand, Manne, Sandman, Lars, Karlsson, Petter, Helgesson, Gert, Eriksson, Stefan, Juth, Niklas
Publicado no BMC Med Ethics (2015)

Conceptions of decision-making capacity in psychiatry: interviews with Swedish psychiatrists

Por Sjöstrand, Manne, Karlsson, Petter, Sandman, Lars, Helgesson, Gert, Eriksson, Stefan, Juth, Niklas
Publicado no BMC Med Ethics (2015)

Q-SEA – a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments

Por Scott, Anna Mae, Hofmann, Björn, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki, Bakke Lysdahl, Kristin, Sandman, Lars, Bombard, Yvonne
Publicado no GMS Health Technol Assess (2017)

FRAMEWORK FOR SYSTEMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF ETHICAL ASPECTS OF HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES: THE SBU APPROACH

Por Heintz, Emelie, Lintamo, Laura, Hultcrantz, Monica, Jacobson, Stella, Levi, Ragnar, Munthe, Christian, Tranæus, Sofia, Östlund, Pernilla, Sandman, Lars
Publicado no Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2015)