Well informed uncertainties about the effects of treatment: Paradox exists in dealing with uncertainty

Por Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Publicado em 2004

Lifting the fog of uncertainty from the practice of medicine: Strategy revolves around evidence, decision making, and leadership

Por Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Publicado em 2004

The Paradox of Equipoise: The Principle That Drives and Limits Therapeutic Discoveries in Clinical Research

Por Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Publicado em 2009

Uncertainty and Equipoise: At Interplay Between Epistemology, Decision-Making and Ethics

Por Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Publicado em 2011

Choosing a control intervention for a randomised clinical trial

Por Mann, Howard, Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Publicado em 2003

When Should Potentially False Research Findings Be Considered Acceptable?

Por Djulbegovic, Benjamin, Hozo, Iztok
Publicado em 2007

Myeloma (multiple)

Por Kumar, Ambuj, Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Publicado em 2006

The Australian 'FORM' approach to guideline development: The quest for the perfect system

Por Dahm, Philipp, Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Publicado em 2011

When is it rational to participate in a clinical trial? A game theory approach incorporating trust, regret and guilt

Por Djulbegovic, Benjamin, Hozo, Iztok
Publicado em 2012

Comparator bias: why comparisons must address genuine uncertainties

Por Mann, Howard, Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Publicado em 2013

Effect of Initial Conditions on Reproducibility of Scientific Research

Por Djulbegovic, Benjamin, Hozo, Iztok
Publicado em 2014

Many faces of rationality: Implications of the great rationality debate for clinical decision‐making

Por Djulbegovic, Benjamin, Elqayam, Shira
Publicado no J Eval Clin Pract (2017)

Declaration of Helsinki should be strengthened : Equipoise is essential principle of human experimentation

Por Lilford, R J, Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Publicado em 2001

Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample

Por Djulbegovic Benjamin, Hozo Stela, Hozo Iztok
Publicado em 2005-04-01

Expected utility versus expected regret theory versions of decision curve analysis do generate different results when treatment effects are taken into account

Por Hozo, Iztok, Tsalatsanis, Athanasios, Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Publicado no J Eval Clin Pract (2016)

Rational decision making in medicine: Implications for overuse and underuse

Por Djulbegovic, Benjamin, Elqayam, Shira, Dale, William
Publicado no J Eval Clin Pract (2017)

Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample

Por Hozo, Stela Pudar, Djulbegovic, Benjamin, Hozo, Iztok
Publicado em 2005

At What Level of Collective Equipoise Does a Randomized Clinical Trial Become Ethical for the Members of Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committees?

Por Mhaskar, Rahul, B. Bercu, Barry, Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Publicado em 2013

From hospice to hospital: short-term follow-up study of hospice patient outcomes in a US acute care hospital surveillance system

Por Pathak, Elizabeth Barnett, Wieten, Sarah, Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Publicado em 2014

A regret theory approach to decision curve analysis: A novel method for eliciting decision makers' preferences and decision-making

Por Tsalatsanis, Athanasios, Hozo, Iztok, Vickers, Andrew, Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Publicado em 2010