Genders, T. S., Petersen, S. E., Pugliese, F., Dastidar, A. G., Fleischmann, K. E., Nieman, K., & Hunink, M. (2013). Stress myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs. coronary CT angiography in the diagnostic work-up of patients with stable chest pain: Comparative effectiveness and costs. BioMed Central.
Citação norma ChicagoGenders, Tessa S., Steffen E. Petersen, Francesca Pugliese, Amardeep Ghosh Dastidar, Kirsten E. Fleischmann, Koen Nieman, and Myriam Hunink. Stress Myocardial Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Vs. Coronary CT Angiography in the Diagnostic Work-up of Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Comparative Effectiveness and Costs. BioMed Central, 2013.
ציטוט MLAGenders, Tessa S., et al. Stress Myocardial Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Vs. Coronary CT Angiography in the Diagnostic Work-up of Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Comparative Effectiveness and Costs. BioMed Central, 2013.